Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Research Articles

Effectiveness of tailored talks between a cancer screening specialist and general practitioners to improve the uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Ancona (Italy) during the pandemic period

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in many countries has been low and further impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. General Practitioners (GPs) are key facilitators, however research on their impact on organised CRC screening is still limited. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of tailored talks with GPs to increase population uptake of the long-established CRC screening programme in Ancona province, Italy. Methods In this prospective cohort study, one-to-one tailored talks were organised in January 2020 between the GPs of one county of the province (with GPs from other counties as controls) and the screening programme physician-in-chief to discuss the deployment and effectiveness of organised screening. Data was extracted from the National Healthcare System datasets and linear regression was used to assess the potential predictors of CRC screening uptake. Results The mean CRC screening uptake remained stable from 39.9% in 2018–19 to 40.8% in 2020–21 in the 22 GPs of the intervention county, whereas it statistically significantly decreased from 38.7% to 34.7% in the 232 control GPs. In multivariate analyses, belonging to the intervention county was associated with an improved uptake compared to the control counties (+5.1%; 95% Confidence Intervals – CI: 2.0%; 8.1%). Conclusion Persons cared for by GPs who received a tailored talk with a cancer screening specialist avoided a drop in CRC screening adherence, which characterised all other Italian screening programmes during the COVID-19 emergency. If future randomised trials confirm the impact of tailored talks, they may be incorporated into existing strategies to improve population CRC screening uptake.

Human fecal alpha-glucosidase activity and its relationship with gut microbiota profiles and early stages of intestinal mucosa damage

We investigated potential relationships among initial lesions of the intestinal mucosa, fecal enzymatic activities and microbiota profiles. Fecal samples from 54 volunteers were collected after recruitment among individuals participating in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in our region (Northern Spain) or attending for consultation due to clinical symptoms; intestinal mucosa samples were resected during colonoscopy. Enzymatic activities were determined in fecal supernatants by a semi-quantitative method. The fecal microbiota composition was determined by 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing. The results were compared between samples from clinical diagnosis groups (controls and polyps), according with the type of polyp (hyperplastic polyps or conventional adenomas) and considering the grade of dysplasia for conventional adenomas (low and high grade dysplasia). High levels of α-glucosidase activity were more frequent among samples from individuals diagnosed with intestinal polyps, reaching statistical significance for conventional adenomas and for low grade dysplasia adenomas when compared to controls. Regarding the microbiota profiles, higher abundance of Christensenellaceae_R-7 group and Oscillospiraceae_UCG-002 were found in fecal samples displaying low α-glucosidase activity as compared with those with higher activity as well as in controls with respect to conventional adenomas. A relationship was evidenced among intestinal mucosal lesions, gut glucosidase activities and intestinal microbiota profiles. Our findings suggest a relationship among altered fecal α-glucosidase levels, the presence of intestinal mucosal lesions, which can be precursors of CRC, and shifts in defined microbial groups of the fecal microbiota.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Large Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can significantly reduce incidence and mortality; however, screening rates are suboptimal. The lowest rates are among those with no usual source of care and the uninsured. We describe the implementation and evaluation of a community-based CRC screening program from 2012 to 2015 designed to increase screening within a predominantly Hispanic US-Mexico border population. The multicomponent, evidence-based program provided in-person, bilingual, culturally tailored health education facilitated by community health workers, no-cost primarily stool-based testing and diagnostic colonoscopy, and navigation. We recruited uninsured individuals due for CRC screening from clinics and community sites. An extensive qualitative and quantitative program process and outcome evaluation was conducted. In total, 20 118 individuals were approached, 8361 were eligible for screening; 74.8% completed screening and 74.6% completed diagnostic testing; 14 cancers were diagnosed. The mean age of participants was 56.8 years, and the majority were Hispanic, female, and of low socioeconomic status. The process evaluation gathered information that enabled effective program implementation and demonstrated effective staff training, compliance with processes, and high patient satisfaction. This program used a population-based approach focusing on uninsured individuals and proved successful at achieving high fecal immunochemical test kit return rates and colonoscopy completion rates. Key factors related to its success included tailoring the intervention to our priority population, strong partnerships with community-based sites and clinics, expertise in clinical CRC screening, and an active community advisory board. This program can serve as a model for similar populations along the border to increase CRC screening rates among the underserved.

Study protocol for a mixed methods approach to optimize colorectal cancer screening in Malaysia: Integrating stakeholders insights and knowledge-to-action framework.

Colorectal cancer is a growing global health concern and the number of reported cases has increased over the years. Early detection through screening is critical to improve outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer. In Malaysia, there is an urgent need to optimize the colorectal cancer screening program as uptake is limited by multiple challenges. This study aims to systematically identify and address gaps in screening service delivery to optimize the Malaysian colorectal cancer screening program. This study uses a mixed methods design. It focuses primarily on qualitative data to understand processes and strategies and to identify specific areas that can be improved through stakeholder engagement in the screening program. Quantitative data play a dual role in supporting the selection of participants for the qualitative study based on program monitoring data and assessing inequalities in screening and program implementation in healthcare facilities in Malaysia. Meanwhile, literature review identifies existing strategies to improve colorectal cancer screening. Additionally, the knowledge-to-action framework is integrated to ensure that the research findings lead to practical improvements to the colorectal cancer screening program. Through this complex mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, this study will explore the complex interplay of population- and systems-level factors that influence screening rates. It involves identifying barriers to effective colorectal cancer screening in Malaysia, comparing current strategies with international best practices, and providing evidence-based recommendations to improve the local screening program.

Colorectal Cancer Screening After Sequential Outreach Components in a Demographically Diverse Cohort.

Organized screening outreach can reduce differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality between demographic subgroups. Outcomes associated with additional outreach, beyond universal outreach, are not well known. To compare CRC screening completion by race and ethnicity, age, and sex after universal automated outreach and additional personalized outreach. This observational cohort study included screening-eligible individuals aged 50 to 75 years assessed during 2019 in a community-based organized CRC screening program within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) integrated health care delivery setting. For KPNC members who are not up to date with screening by colonoscopy, each year the program first uses automated outreach (mailed prescreening notification postcards and fecal immunochemical test [FIT] kits, automated telephone calls, and postcard reminders), followed by personalized components for nonresponders (telephone calls, electronic messaging, and screening offers during office visits). Data analyses were performed between November 2021 and February 2023 and completed on February 5, 2023. Completed CRC screening via colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or FIT. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants completing an FIT or colonoscopy after each component of the screening process. Differences across subgroups were assessed using the χ2 test. This study included 1 046 745 KPNC members. Their mean (SD) age was 61.1 (6.9) years, and more than half (53.2%) were women. A total of 0.4% of members were American Indian or Alaska Native, 18.5% were Asian, 7.2% were Black, 16.2% were Hispanic, 0.8% were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and 56.5% were White. Automated outreach significantly increased screening participation by 31.1%, 38.1%, 29.5%, 31.9%, 31.8%, and 34.5% among these groups, respectively; follow-up personalized outreach further significantly increased participation by absolute additional increases of 12.5%, 12.4%, 13.3%, 14.4%, 14.7%, and 11.2%, respectively (all differences P < .05 compared with White members). Overall screening coverage at the end of the yearly program differed significantly among members who were American Indian or Alaska Native (74.1%), Asian (83.5%), Black (77.7%), Hispanic (76.4%), or Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (74.4%) compared with White members (82.2%) (all differences P < .05 compared with White members). Screening completion was similar by sex; older members were substantially more likely to be up to date with CRC screening both before and at the end of the screening process. In this cohort study of a CRC screening program, sequential automated and personalized strategies each contributed to substantial increases in screening completion in all demographic groups. These findings suggest that such programs may potentially reduce differences in CRC screening completion across demographic groups.

Access to colorectal cancer screening in populations in China, 2020: A coverage-focused synthesis analysis.

In populations in China, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can be mainly accessed through organized screening, opportunistic screening, and physical examination. This screening intervention is found to be effective but the exact coverage rate is difficult to measure. Based on data from published articles, official websites, and available program reports, the screening coverage rate and related indicators were quantified. A rapid review was then conducted to estimate the overall and the breakdown coverage rates of the sub-type screening services, by leveraging the numbers of articles and the by-type median sample sizes. Up to 2020, two central government-funded and four provincial/municipal-level organized CRC screening programs have been initiated and included in this analysis. For populations aged 40-74, the estimated coverage rate of organized programs in China was 2.7% in 2020, and the 2-year cumulative coverage rate in 2019-2020 was 5.3% and the 3-year cumulative coverage rate in 2018-2020 was 7.7%. The corresponding coverage rates of 50-74-year-olds were estimated to be 3.4%, 7.1%, and 10.3%, respectively. Based on the rapid review approach, the overall screening coverage rate for 40-74 years, considering organized screening programs, opportunistic screening, and physical examinations, was then estimated to be 3.0% in China in 2020. However, comparing the findings of this study with the number of health check-ups reported in the local national health statistics yearbooks suggeststhat the number of CRC physical examinations may be underestimated in this study. The findings suggest that further efforts are needed to improve population access to CRC screening in China. Furthermore, evidence for access to opportunistic CRC screening and physical examination is limited, and more quantitative investigation is needed.

Endoscopic treatment of scarred polyps with a non-thermal device (Endorotor): A review of the literature‎.

Endoscopic resection (ER) of colorectal polyps has become a daily practice in most endoscopic units providing a colorectal cancer screening program and requires the availability of local experts and high-end endoscopic devices. ER procedures have evolved over the past few years from endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to more advanced techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and endo-scopic full-thickness resection. Complete resection and disease eradication are the ultimate goals of ER-based techniques, and novel devices have been developed to achieve these goals. The EndoRotor® Endoscopic Powered Resection System (Interscope Medical, Inc., Northbridge, Massachusetts, United States) is one such device. The EndoRotor is a powered resection tool for the removal of alimentary tract mucosa, including post-EMR persistent lesions with scarring, and has both CE Mark and FDA clearance. This review covers available published evidence documenting the usefulness of EndoRotor for the management of recurrent colorectal polyps.

Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT): Considerations on Sampling and Markers (Hb and Hb/Hp Complex) of Fecal Occult Blood (FOB).

Formal demonstration of the efficacy of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in reducing CRC incidence and mortality is still missing. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of sampling and FIT marker in the recently implemented CRC screening program in Finland. Because only the index test [FIT hemoglobin (Hb)]-positive subjects are verified by the reference test (colonoscopy), the new screening program is subject to verification bias that precludes estimating the diagnostic accuracy (DA) indicators. A previously published study (5) with 100% biopsy verification of colonoscopy referral subjects (called validation cohort, n=300) was used to derive these missing DA estimates. Two points of concern were addressed: i) only one-day sample tested, and ii) only the Hb component (but not Hb/Hp complex) was analyzed by FIT. The estimated DA of one-sample testing for Hb in the screening setting had a very low sensitivity (SE) (12.5%; 95%CI=12.3-12.7) for adenomas, with AUC=0.560 (for CRC, AUC=0.950). Testing three samples for Hb improved SE to 19.4% (95%CI=19.1-19.7%) but had little effect on overall DA (AUC=0.590). For adenomas, one-sample testing for Hb and Hb/Hp complex provided higher SE than three-sample testing for Hb (SE 20.6%; 95%CI=20.3-21.0), and the best SE was reached when two samples were tested for Hb and Hb/Hp complex (SE 47.5%; 95%CI=46.9-48.1%) (AUC=0.730). The strategy of the current CRC screening could be significantly improved by testing two consecutive samples by Hb and Hb/Hp complex, instead of stand-alone Hb testing of one sample.

Abstract 4871: Colorectal cancer incidence and overall survival by race, stage, and age: A SEER database analysis, 2009-2020

Abstract Introduction: In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although incidence rates of CRC have been decreasing overall, recent studies suggest a shift in demographics, specifically an increase in the number of new CRC cases among younger individuals and a higher incidence among those who identify as non-Hispanic Native American/Alaska Native. To examine the latest trends in incidence and overall survival (OS) among adults with CRC in the United States, we conducted an observational study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed CRC between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020 were identified in the SEER 17 database. Age-adjusted incidence rates for CRC were calculated by race/ethnicity and age groups (18-49, 50-64, and ≥65 years) from 2009 to 2020. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to examine 5-year OS by race/ethnicity, stage, and age groups. Results: There were 429,218 CRC cases identified with a median age of 67 years. Most were male (52.4%) with stage 0-II CRC (51.4%). Most patients identified as non-Hispanic White (66.3%), followed by non-Hispanic Black (11.5%), non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander (8.9%), non-Hispanic Native American/Alaska Native (0.7%), and Hispanic of any race (12.7%). The age-adjusted incidence rate between 2009 and 2020 was 51.9 per 100,000 persons; incidence decreased from 59.5 per 100,000 persons in 2009 to 44.2 per 100,000 persons in 2020, with male patients having a higher incidence rate than female patients. By 2020, non-Hispanic Native American/Alaska Native patients had the highest incidence rate (54.5 per 100,000 persons) followed by non-Hispanic Black patients (50.6 per 100,000 persons). CRC incidence rates increased slightly for age &amp;lt;50 years (10.5 to 12.9 per 100,000 persons) and decreased for ages 50-64 (74.6 to 63.9 per 100,000 persons) and ≥65 years (222.4 to 136.1 per 100,000 persons). Non-Hispanic Black patients (53%), age ≥65 years (47%), and those with stage III-IV CRC (41%) had a lower 5-year OS from 2015 to 2019 compared to patients who were non-Hispanic White (57%), aged 50-64 (68%) and &amp;lt;50 years (70%), and with stage 0-II CRC (77%). Conclusion: Our results confirm a slight increase in CRC incidence among younger (&amp;lt;50 years) individuals over the 2009-2020 time period. Patients who were non-Hispanic Native American/Alaska Native had the highest CRC incidence rate and patients who were non-Hispanic Black had the poorest OS. Targeted preventative efforts such as CRC screening programs in addition to improved access to care/treatment may be needed to reduce the number of new cases and improve outcomes among historically underserved groups. Citation Format: Alicia C. McDonald, Seongjung Joo, Jiemin Ma, Mayur M. Amonkar, Changxia Shao, Kaushal Desai, Anne C. Deitz. Colorectal cancer incidence and overall survival by race, stage, and age: A SEER database analysis, 2009-2020 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4871.

Abstract 4787: Preference for multi-target stool DNA for colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native people in rural/remote communities

Abstract Background: The Alaska Tribal Health System is working on increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates among Alaska Native people, who have the highest CRC rates in the world. Most remote Alaska Native communities are not connected to the road system, which severely limits access to screening colonoscopy. As part of a clinical trial, Alaska Native patients were offered either colonoscopy or the at-home multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA; Cologuard®). Patients had never been offered mt-sDNA before and it was unknown what they would think about the new test option. Both tests were provided at no cost to patients. Methods: From April 2022 to July 2023, 194 patients who chose mt-sDNA for screening received a follow-up phone survey asking whether they were aware that they could have had colonoscopy instead, their reasons for choosing mt-sDNA, and the factors influencing their choice of mt-sDNA over colonoscopy. Patients answered the survey before receiving results of their mt-sDNA test in order to capture initial screening test preferences. Results: A total of 115 (59%) Alaska Native patients participated in the survey; 56% men and 44% women. About 70% were ages 45 to 60 years while the remaining 30% were 61 to 75 years old. The majority (80%) were aware that they had the option to undergo colonoscopy for CRC screening instead of mt-sDNA. Key themes for mt-sDNA preference included not having to travel, less time commitment, and greater convenience. Many patients expressed financial concerns arising from the costs of air travel and accommodation required to access screening colonoscopy even though the procedure itself was covered. Additionally, patients highlighted existing obligations such as childcare and work responsibilities which made the use of mt-sDNA at home more appealing. Many respondents also shared negative perceptions of colonoscopy procedure including fear, embarrassment, and discomfort as reasons why they preferred mt-sDNA instead. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the multifaceted factors influencing the preference for at-home mt-sDNA CRC screening among Alaska Native individuals. Challenges such as limited access to medical facilities, financial burdens, and personal commitments have significant bearing on the screening decision-making process. Moreover, the emotional aspect of fear and discomfort associated with colonoscopy plays a role in shaping these preferences. CRC screening programs need to be aware of patient needs and preferences when deciding which screening methods to offer to increase screening rates and result in improved colorectal health outcomes. Citation Format: Diana Redwood. Preference for multi-target stool DNA for colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native people in rural/remote communities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4787.

Abstract 6079: Comparison of FIT and cell-free DNA analyses for detection of individuals with colorectal cancer in population based screening

Abstract Background The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is widely used in population based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. Recently, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analyses have emerged as a new avenue for early cancer detection. The performance of cfDNA methods in comparison with FIT is currently unknown. The present study compared pre-operative cfDNA analyses to FIT for detection of patients with CRC who participated in a population-based screening program. Methods In the Dutch national CRC screening program, individuals aged 55-75 years are biennially invited to perform a single FIT. The database of the Dutch CRC screening program was queried to identify individuals with FIT data who also participated in two cfDNA studies, PLCRC-MEDOCC and PLCRC-PROVENC3 (AACR abstract C. Rubio Alarcón). Sensitivities with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for detecting individuals with CRC were determined for FIT, tumor-informed cfDNA analyses, as well as both tests combined. For FIT, sensitivities were determined at 20 µg and 47 µg hemoglobin (Hb)/g feces positivity cut-offs as these represent the most commonly used international and Dutch cut-offs, respectively. Liquid biopsy analyses were performed using next generation sequencing of cfDNA. Tumor-specific alterations were identified through parallel next generation sequence analysis of resected tumor tissues. Results The query identified 120 individuals with stage I (n=3, 2.5%), stage II (n= 57, 47.5%) and stage III (n=60, 50.0%) CRC who had participated in the Dutch CRC screening program and either PLCRC-MEDOCC or PLCRC-PROVENC3. All FIT samples were collected at a median time of 38 days before diagnosis (IQR 27-112 days). FIT sensitivity for detection of individuals with CRC was 83.3% (100/120 CRCs, 95% CI 75.4-89.5%) at a 20 µg Hb/g feces cut-off and 80.0% (96/120, 95% CI 71.7-86.7%) at a 47 µg Hb/g feces cut-off. Tumor-informed cfDNA analyses detected 75.8% (91/120, 95% CI 67.2-83.2%) of individuals with CRC in this population. The combination of cfDNA analyses and and FIT (20 µg Hb/g feces cut-off) identified almost all individuals with CRCs (119/120, sensitivity 99.2%, 95% CI 97.0-100%). The individual who was missed had a cancer that was a T3N0 microsatellite stable moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma in the ascending colon. Discussion While both FIT and cfDNA analyses identified most CRC cases (75-83%) in this series, both tests also demonstrated a substantial level of complementarity, indicating that in principle combining FIT with cell-free DNA testing would allow to increase sensitivity of CRC screening. Since the cell-free DNA tests used here are tumor-informed, which in real life screening practice is not feasible, it remains to be determined to what extent this result can be reached using non-tumor-informed approaches. Citation Format: Pieter Henk Abraham Wisse, Carmen Rubio-Alarcon, Suzanna J. Schraa, Adria C. Mosquera, Mark Sausen, Remond J. Fijneman, Geraldine R. Vink, Meike de Wit, Jillian Phallen, Victor E. Velculescu, Beatriz Carvalho, Gerrit A. Meijer. Comparison of FIT and cell-free DNA analyses for detection of individuals with colorectal cancer in population based screening [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6079.

Exogenous Insulin Therapy Is Associated with the Risk of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.

Exogenous insulin therapy increases systemic exposure to insulin which may promote the development of colorectal neoplasia. We sought to evaluate the association between exogenous insulin therapy and the incidence of advanced adenoma in type 2 diabetes mellitus. A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2018, in a regional health system serving the United States Philadelphia metropolitan area, Central New Jersey, and South Central Pennsylvania. Study patients consisted of a random sample of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged 40-80years who had undergone two rounds of colonoscopy examinations. The exposure was cumulative duration of insulin therapy (i.e., no use, 1-365days and > 365days). The outcome was time to incident advanced adenoma. Of the 975 eligible patients, 184 patients accumulated > 365days of insulin therapy before the follow-up colonoscopy. The mean (standard deviation) duration between the two rounds of colonoscopy examination was 5.1 (2.9) years among the insulin users and 5.3 (3.9) years among non-users. Compared to no insulin exposure, receiving > 365days of insulin therapy was associated with an increased incidence of advanced adenoma (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.82-8.30), right-sided advanced adenoma (aHR 5.48, 95% CI 2.90-10.35), and 3 or more adenomas (aHR 2.61, 95% CI 1.46-4.69) at the follow-up colonoscopy examination. Insulin therapy is associated with an increased risk of advanced adenoma and may serve as a novel risk-stratification factor to enhance the efficiency of existing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance programs.

The association between organised colorectal cancer screening strategies and reduction of its related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundTo assess the long-term association between organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategies and CRC-relate mortality.MethodsWe systematically reviewed studies on organised CRC screening through PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane from the inception. We retrieved characteristics of organised CRC screening from included literature and matched mortality (over 50 years) of those areas from the International Agency for Research on Cancer in May 2023. The variations of mortality were reported via the age-standardised mortality ratio. A random-effects model was used to synthesis results.ResultsWe summarised 58 organised CRC screening programmes and recorded > 2.7 million CRC-related deaths from 22 countries where rollout screening programmes were performed. The CRC screening strategy with faecal tests (guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or faecal immunochemical tests (FIT)) or colonoscopy as the primary screening offer was associated with a 41.8% reduction in mortality, which was higher than those offered gFOBT (4.4%), FIT (16.7%), gFOBT or FIT (16.2%), and faecal tests (gFOBT or FIT) or flexible sigmoidoscopy (16.7%) as primary screening test. The longer duration of screening was associated with a higher reduction in the pooled age-standardised mortality ratio. In particular, the pooled age-standardised mortality ratio became non-significant when the screening of FIT was implemented for less than 5 years.ConclusionsA CRC screening programme running for > 5 years was associated with a reduction of CRC-related mortality. Countries with a heavy burden of CRC should implement sustainable, organised screening providing a choice between faecal tests and colonoscopy as a preferred primary test.

Post-polypectomy surveillance: follow-up recommendations from the Alberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

Abstract In 2013, the Alberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (ACRCSP) initially published recommendations for post-colonoscopy follow-up and polypectomy. Over time, emerging evidence and evolving surveillance guidelines from various expert groups necessitated a comprehensive review to align with the healthcare landscape in Alberta. To accomplish this, an expert panel was convened. Using the Agree II tool, we identified high-quality Clinical Practice Guidelines that were relevant to the Alberta medical context. Recommendations from these guidelines were adapted to fit the specific needs of Alberta. Recognizing inconsistencies and gaps within the existing guidelines, we conducted targeted literature reviews to ensure a comprehensive and evidence-based approach to our recommendations. Our revised recommendations build upon the assumption that a high-quality index colonoscopy has been performed at baseline. They are intended to enhance the quality of care and reduce unnecessary procedures. As well, they align with the growing consensus in the scientific literature that individuals with low-risk tubular adenomas may not require aggressive colonoscopy surveillance. The updated Alberta recommendations aim to provide clear recommendations for practicing endoscopists, referring physicians, and their patients. They address crucial questions such as determining which patients should commence surveillance via colonoscopy and which individuals should return to average-risk screening using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Additionally, our recommendations outline the appropriate surveillance intervals for those requiring continued monitoring.

The projected health and economic impact of increased colorectal cancer screening participation among Canadians by income quintile.

Disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake by socioeconomic status have been observed in Canada. We used the OncoSim-Colorectal model to evaluate the health and economic outcomes associated with increasing the participation rates of CRC screening programs to 60% among Canadians in different income quintiles. Baseline CRC screening participation rates were obtained from the 2017 Canadian Community Health Survey. The survey participants were categorized into income quintiles using their reported household income and 2016 Canadian Census income quintile thresholds. Within each quintile, the participation rate was the proportion of respondents aged 50-74 who reported having had a fecal test in the past two years. Using the OncoSim-Colorectal model, we simulated an increase in CRC screening uptake to 60% across income quintiles to assess the effects on CRC incidence, mortality, and associated economic costs from 2024 to 2073. Increasing CRC screening participation rates to 60% across all income quintiles would prevent 69,100 CRC cases and 36,600 CRC deaths over 50 years. The improvement of clinical outcomes would also translate to increased person-years and health-adjusted person-years. The largest impact was observed in the lowest income group, with 22,200 cases and 11,700 deaths prevented over 50 years. Increased participation could lead to higher screening costs ($121 million CAD more per year) and lower treatments costs ($95 million CAD less per year), averaged over the period 2024-2073. Increased screening participation will improve clinical outcomes across all income groups while alleviating associated treatment costs. The benefits of increased participation will be strongest among the lowest income quintile.

Association between time to colonoscopy after positive fecal testing and colorectal cancer outcomes in Alberta, Canada.

To quantify the associations between time to colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT+) and colorectal cancer (CRC)-related outcomes in the context of a provincial, population-based CRC screening program. Population-based, retrospective cohort study in Alberta, Canada, including Albertans aged 50-74 with at least one FIT+ in 2014-2017. Study outcomes were CRC diagnosis after a FIT+ and a diagnostic follow-up colonoscopy in 2014-2019 and CRC stage at diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relative risk of any CRC or advanced-stage CRC. Results were presented as crude odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Of the 787,967 participants who had a FIT, 63,232 (8%) had a FIT+ and met the study's eligibility criteria. The risk of any CRC or advanced-stage CRC stayed high and was relatively consistent for follow-up colonoscopies performed within 1-12 months of the FIT+. After 12 months, the risk of CRC was considerably higher, particularly for advanced-stage CRC. The OR and aOR for any CRC were 1.40 (95% CI: 1.13-1.73; p < 0.05) and 1.20 (95% CI: 0.96-1.49), respectively, and the OR and aOR for advanced-stage CRC were 1.42 (95% CI: 0.98-2.08) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.59-1.32), respectively, for colonoscopy follow-up within 12-18 months versus 1-2 months. For Albertans who used FIT for CRC screening, a longer time interval between a FIT+ and follow-up colonoscopy, particularly over 12 months, increases the risk of having CRC and decreases the effectiveness of CRC screening programs.

Deaths and cardiopulmonary events following colorectal cancer screening-A systematic review with meta-analyses.

Colorectal cancer screening programmes (CRCSPs) are implemented worldwide despite recent evidence indicating more physical harm occurring during CRCSPs than previously thought. Therefore, we aimed to review the evidence on physical harms associated with endoscopic diagnostic procedures during CRCSPs and, when possible, to quantify the risk of the most serious types of physical harm during CRCSPs, i.e. deaths and cardiopulmonary events (CPEs). Systematic review with descriptive statistics and random-effects meta-analyses of studies investigating physical harms following CRCSPs. We conducted a systematic search in the literature and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. We included 134 studies for review, reporting findings from 151 unique populations when accounting for multiple screening interventions per study. Physical harm can be categorized into 17 types of harm. The evidence was very heterogeneous with inadequate measurement and reporting of harms. The risk of bias was serious or critical in 95% of assessments of deaths and CPEs, and the certainty of the evidence was very low in all analyses. The risk of death was assessed for 57 populations with large variation across studies. Meta-analyses indicated that 3 to 23 deaths occur during CRCSPs per 100,000 people screened. Cardiopulmonary events were assessed for 55 populations. Despite our efforts to subcategorize CPEs into 17 distinct subtypes, 41% of CPE assessments were too poorly measured or reported to allow quantification. We found a tendency towards lower estimates of deaths and CPEs in studies with a critical risk of bias. Deaths and CPEs during CRCSPs are rare, yet they do occur during CRCSPs. We believe that our findings are conservative due to the heterogeneity and low quality of the evidence. A standardized system for the measurement and reporting of the harms of screening is warranted. PROSPERO Registration number CRD42017058844.

Oncologic outcomes of screen-detected and non-screen-detected T1 colorectal cancers.

The incidence of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased with the implementation of CRC screening programs. It is unknown whether the outcomes and risk models for T1 CRC based on non-screen-detected patients can be extrapolated to screen-detected T1 CRC. This study aimed to compare the stage distribution and oncologic outcomes of T1 CRC patients within and outside the screening program. Data from T1 CRC patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 were collected from 12 hospitals in the Netherlands. The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) at diagnosis was compared between screen-detected and non-screen-detected patients using multivariable logistic regression. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to analyze differences in the time to recurrence (TTR), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival. Additionally, the performance of conventional risk factors for LNM was evaluated across the groups. 1803 patients were included (1114 [62%] screen-detected), with median follow-up of 51 months (interquartile range 30). The proportion of LNM did not significantly differ between screen- and non-screen-detected patients (12.6% vs. 8.9%; odds ratio 1.41; 95%CI 0.89-2.23); a prediction model for LNM performed equally in both groups. The 3- and 5-year TTR, MFS, and CSS were similar for patients within and outside the screening program. However, overall survival was significantly longer in screen-detected T1 CRC patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51; 95%CI 0.38-0.68). Screen-detected and non-screen-detected T1 CRCs have similar stage distributions and oncologic outcomes and can therefore be treated equally. However, screen-detected T1 CRC patients exhibit a lower rate of non-CRC-related mortality, resulting in longer overall survival.

Screening for colorectal cancer by full colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: a multicentric study by the Italian League for the Fight against Cancer.

Colorectal cancer currently presents the third-highest incidence of cancers worldwide, making secondary prevention through screening programs for colorectal cancer, usually by Fecal Occult Blood Testing, an essential preventive medicine intervention. First-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients are a particularly at-risk group, with indications to consider direct screening by full colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing colorectal cancer, as it has high sensitivity and specificity, and is both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. However, it requires significant organizational and financial resources, and has a small but relatively higher risk of complications as opposed to fecal occult blood testing. The present study aimed to assess the appropriateness of a screening program without age restrictions of CRC by full colonoscopy in asymptomatic, first-degree adult relatives of patients with colorectal cancer, aiming both to actively increase screening coverage and to determine the detection rate of precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer in this population. Uncontrolled interventional study - colorectal cancer screening by full colonoscopy for at-risk population. The Italian League for the Fight against Cancer started a colorectal cancer screening program by full colonoscopy for first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in 1998 in the province of Latina, Lazio Region, Italy. The program was expanded to the provinces of Rieti, Lazio Region, and Sassari, Sardinia Region, in 2014 and 2016 respectively, and was concluded in 2018. Subjects were actively and voluntarily recruited by the study's working group. Subjects that had already been subjected to a full colonoscopy in the preceding 5 years were excluded from this study. Identified neoplastic lesions were treated either directly or referred to the Day Hospital setting, and histologically diagnosed following World Health Organization guidelines. In total, 2,288 subjects (age range 15-88, mean 52.3 yrs, M/F = 946/1,204) were screened by colonoscopy, of which 103 (4.5%) were incomplete and 2,173 (95.0%) complete, with data on colonoscopy performance missing for 12 participants. Out of 468 positive outcomes on colonoscopy, diagnosis for 422 (204M/173F), 19.4% of total subjects, was adenomatous polyps and 46 (20M/20F), 2.1% of total subjects, was colorectal cancer. Female sex was a protective factor against a positive test outcome, with a 35% reduction compared to male sex, with OR=0.64 95%CI (0.52-0.80). On the other hand, being over 50 years of age was found to be a risk factor, making a positive outcome more than twice as likely, with OR=2.3 95%CI (1.8-2.9). Subjects over 50 also had significantly more instances of multiple adenomas being found, however the size distribution of found adenomas was not significantly different between subjects under and over 50, despite size being a predictor of risk of neoplastic progression. Given the high detection rate of precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer in the studied population, it is our opinion that guidelines should continue to recommend earlier and more frequent screening in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer, and, barring the introduction of more cost-effective and/or lower risk procedures with a similar efficacy profile, maintain the use of colonoscopy as the main screening option.

The histologic features, molecular features, detection and management of serrated polyps: a review.

The serrated pathway to colorectal cancers (CRCs) is a significant pathway encompassing five distinct types of lesions, namely hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia (SSL-Ds), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs), and serrated adenoma unclassified. In contrast to the conventional adenoma-carcinoma pathway, the serrated pathway primarily involves two mechanisms: BRAF/KRAS mutations and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). HPs are the most prevalent non-malignant lesions, while SSLs play a crucial role as precursors to CRCs, On the other hand, traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) are the least frequently encountered subtype, also serving as precursors to CRCs. It is crucial to differentiate these lesions based on their unique morphological characteristics observed in histology and colonoscopy, as the identification and management of these serrated lesions significantly impact colorectal cancer screening programs. The management of these lesions necessitates the crucial steps of removing premalignant lesions and implementing regular surveillance. This article provides a comprehensive summary of the epidemiology, histologic features, molecular features, and detection methods for various serrated polyps, along with recommendations for their management and surveillance.